| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Jack Miton
WeebleCORP
4672
   |
Posted - 2015.09.18 12:24:18 -
[1] - Quote
He's not wrong on any particular point, but the article itself should just be titled 'sh!t we already know'.
There is no Bob.
Stuck In Here With Me: http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/
Down the Pipe: http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout
|
Jack Miton
WeebleCORP
4673
|
Posted - 2015.09.18 15:28:53 -
[2] - Quote
Two step wrote:My problem is that people don't get mad anymore. If you haven't done exactly what I described, you aren't playing EVE right.
Amen brother :)
There is no Bob.
Stuck In Here With Me: http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/
Down the Pipe: http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout
|
Jack Miton
WeebleCORP
4676
|
Posted - 2015.09.20 03:22:25 -
[3] - Quote
Daniela Doran wrote:And replaced with what? What other ships besides Caps can do C5/C6s reliably?
Back in the day C6s were run by Guardian supported T3 fleets and it worked just fine.
You can also take a carrier and 6 BSs into the static to run sites.
Now you could also easily run then in Marauders.
C5s can be done in RR BSs or better.
There is no Bob.
Stuck In Here With Me: http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/
Down the Pipe: http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout
|
Jack Miton
WeebleCORP
4676
|
Posted - 2015.09.20 11:54:53 -
[4] - Quote
KIAGumpy wrote:PVP groups don't live in Mags
While this is currently true, it is the stupidest sentence ever written on these forums.
There is no Bob.
Stuck In Here With Me: http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/
Down the Pipe: http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout
|
Jack Miton
WeebleCORP
4681
|
Posted - 2015.09.21 01:37:25 -
[5] - Quote
Braxus Deninard wrote:the problem right there. so many people just don't have any motivation or effort to go out and hunt (which is part of the reason behind cap escalating being relatively safe at the moment) and they took the mag over a no effect so that they could do lots of sites, and there's nothing wrong with that when it's funding a pvp corp but they weren't ever active as a pvp corp either because they just didn't put the effort in.
running PVE for 1.5 hours a day makes you a PVE corp, not a PVP corp.
There is no Bob.
Stuck In Here With Me: http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/
Down the Pipe: http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout
|
Jack Miton
Anomalous Existence
Low-Class
4691
|
Posted - 2015.09.23 05:15:06 -
[6] - Quote
I mean, sure... except if you only want to make escalations 'more dangerous' (and we're talking from a PVP sense, not a PVE one since theypre p!ss easy to run), why not just increase the guardian EHP 10x so that the caps have to be on field 10x as long?
Achieves the goal right? And does so without reducing the isk available at all too!
A lot of people here are commenting things like 'yeah I'm rolling is escalation ISK, they're OP as hell! though you can't nerf them, that would be mean! you need to fix OTHER aspects of WHs to compensate for my immense greed and wealth!'.
Bottom line is you don't WANT sites to be 'more dangerous', regardless of how you're spinning it. You just want to sound like you do and have CCP make changes that sound like they're nerfing escalations but really aren't.
Even if you increased WH spawn rate and introduced WH Concord that would randomly show up and insta kill you to the point where everyone was getting ganked in their PVE cap fleets 1-2 times a week, you'd STILL be making more money than you know what to do with.
But yeah, I'm sure escalations are fine and the issues lie elsewhere...
It's utter bullsh!t and I expect you'll be in for a rude surprise once CCP actually do something about it. (Here's hoping to soon.)
There is no Bob.
Stuck In Here With Me: http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/
Down the Pipe: http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout
|
Jack Miton
Anomalous Existence
Low-Class
4692
|
Posted - 2015.09.23 10:11:47 -
[7] - Quote
or they could, i dunno, rework sites to get people to run them in their statics for the same effect?
I get it, you like isk. doesnt make you any less wrong and your opinion any more reasonable.
There is no Bob.
Stuck In Here With Me: http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/
Down the Pipe: http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout
|
Jack Miton
Anomalous Existence
Low-Class
4695
|
Posted - 2015.09.24 12:21:20 -
[8] - Quote
Kalel Nimrott wrote:Australians against Rek!
I've been a member the longest!
There is no Bob.
Stuck In Here With Me: http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/
Down the Pipe: http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout
|
| |
|